Home » US News » Exit poll reductions not likely to lessen Catholic vote impact

Exit poll reductions not likely to lessen Catholic vote impact

 

A decision to reduce the number of states included in exit polls after the 2012 presidential election is not expected to detract from the importance attached to the Catholic vote or future efforts by candidates to attract Catholics as a group.

Dr. Mark M. Gray, research associate at Georgetown University’s Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate, explained that the change means “we won’t be able to discern how Catholics voted nationally as quickly as we have in the past.”

However, he told CNA on Oct. 17 that he believes the votes of Catholics and other subgroups will still be a significant topic of discussion following the upcoming election.

On Oct. 4, the Washington Post reported that the decision to eliminate the polls in some states had been made by the National Election Pool, which sponsors national exit surveys of voters in order for the media to make predictions about election outcomes before all the votes have been counted.

For 20 years, exit polls after presidential elections have included voters in all 50 states. However, this year that number will be cut to 31 states, eliminating the surveys from 19 states where there is already a high level of confidence that one candidate will win.

The change will allow exit polls to focus on gathering data from hotly-contested swing states.

ABC News elections director Dan Merkle, a member of the National Election Pool’s managing committee, said the decision was to an attempt to maintain quality while dealing with increasing costs.

An increase in early voting has necessitated a rise in the use of telephone interviews rather than cheaper in-person precinct polls.

In addition, the National Election Pool is increasing the number of precincts that will be sampled in the national survey this year, facilitating detailed analysis of subgroups.

The states that will not have exit polls this year are: Alaska, Arkansas, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming. The District of Columbia will also be excluded.

As a result, analysts and researchers will not be able to see the individual state breakdown of voters by religion, sex, age or race in these states.

However, Gray explained that he does not think the change will affect the way in which campaigns appeal to the Catholic electorate.

“It does not diminish the importance of the Catholic vote either,” he added. For years, the Catholic vote has been considered an important demographic in presidential elections.

“The loss of the national exit polls simply means we won’t quickly be able to discern how Catholics voted,” Gray explained. Instead, analysts will have to rely on small national surveys, such as The National Election Study, which “won’t be released for some time after the election.” [More]

SOURCE

CNA

 
 
 
 

5 Comments

  1. Joseph Francis says:

    To Recovering Catholic. I aggree with you. The News media is owned by the liberal Democratics. Remember, Obama is a charmer, His record tells the truth. It is over for America if he is re-elected, especially the Catholic church

    • Joanna says:

      Oh, please! This is like saying the Church is dead if the Vatican is bombed. It is not “over” for the Church regardless who is elected, regardless who “owns” the media. Honestly, do you believe in God, or not? Who do you think is in charge?

    • Catholic Lady says:

      It will take more than any American or for that matter any other governments leader to cause God’s Church to be over. Remember the church when persecuted only becomes stronger – was it not St. Paul who penned the words “when I am week, then I am strong” The Holy Catholic Church is protected by Her Lord.

  2. Recovering Catholic says:

    Here’s my own personal poll: Of my six brothers and sisters, five of them live in either Wisconsin or Ohio. Before presidential debate #1, they were all going to vote for Obama. After debate #1, they had all changed their minds and were now leaning toward voting Mitt Romney. After presidential debate #2, they have all definitely decided to vote for Mitt Romney.

    I watched presidential debate #2 and thought Mitt Romney did a very polished, professional job while Obama appeared defensive, spat out his usual slogans and was in general, an empty suit. I turned off the t.v. knowing he had hit another home run. I was amazed to hear afterward all these news agency declaring Obama had won presidential debate #2! Huh? Were they watching the same debate I and my brothers and sisters were? Or do these news agencies just have an “agenda” and would call Obama the winner regardless? Obama didn’t win; he looked like an empty suit again.

  3. Florian says:

    If predictions were votes, Newt would win, big, and Jesus would lose.

 
 

Leave a Comment

 




 
 

 
 
 

Switch to our mobile site