Home » Opinion » Dances with Hacks: Bishops as Politicians

Dances with Hacks: Bishops as Politicians

 

Long a bouquet of shy wallflowers compared with evangelicals, Catholic bishops are at last joining the dance at the Republican party. The big step forward will be made as New York’s Cardinal Timothy Dolan says the closing benediction at the GOP convention this week. His appearance marks the first time in 40 years that an American cardinal has traveled cross-country for this purpose, and it comes as the churchmen reveal themselves to be more like politicians — in style and substance — than ever before.

The Republicans have danced to this song many times before. Since 1980, the party has used evangelicals to win elections but denied them most of what they want in policy from restoration of school prayer to a nationwide ban on abortion. With Mitt Romney’s selection of the fiercely anti-abortion Paul Ryan, he signaled the party is now taking conservative Catholics for a whirl. However, everything in Romney’s flip-flopping character suggests that once again, religiously motivated voters will give up their votes and get little in return.

For their part, the Catholic hierarchs are abandoning the restraint that once made them credible as moral leaders above the partisan fray. The danger in this choice is evident when you consider that a majority of Catholics disagree with their leaders. They use contraception and oppose the GOP’s “no exceptions” abortion stand. Polls also show Catholics support gay rights and marriage at about the same rate as the general population. These Catholics are not pleased to see their bishops lining up with party hacks or with an evangelical movement that includes a significant number of anti-Catholic bigots.

The fact that Timothy Dolan is leading the bishops in a partisan direction is not a surprise. Take away the clerical clothes and the cardinal is the central casting version of an old pol, glad-handing and joking in one minute and deflecting and deceiving in the next. As Laurie Goodstein of the New York Times reported in May, the cardinal lied about money paid to Wisconsin priests who had been accused of sexual abuse when he was their bishop. He described the money as “charity” when it was intended to induce them to leave the priesthood as quickly as possible. When documents surfaced contradicting Dolan, local Church officials admitted as much. New York’s prelate chose to attack the suggestion that something was amiss as “false, preposterous and unjust.”

Of course, it was the scheme itself that was preposterous and unjust. As officials of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests asked, “In what other occupation, especially one working with families and operating schools and youth programs, is an employee given a cash bonus for raping and sexually assaulting children?”

In true political style, Dolan used an encounter with reporters to attack the press and his critics, rather than speak as a moral leader. “SNAP has no credibility whatsoever,” Dolan said. “To respond to charges like that that are groundless and scurrilous in my book is useless and counterproductive.” In shifting blame and dodging responsibility, Dolan sounded like a blustering partisan, not a pastor.

Dolan isn’t alone on the hierarchy’s march into party politics. As a group the bishops have joined the GOP in opposing the Obama health care reform program. Bishop Daniel Jenky of Peoria sounded a lot like someone from the political fringe when he spoke of Hitler and Stalin and added, “President Obama with his radical pro-abortion and extreme secularist agenda now seems intent on following a similar path.” Baltimore’s Archbishop William Lori said that the bishops had reached a moment in politics “we have to draw the line in the sand.”

The main thing the bishops cite when they explain their ire is the requirement that institutions that aren’t churches provide contraception coverage as part of employee health insurance. Dozens of states have imposed a similar requirement for years (some don’t even exempt churches) with no outcry from the Church. But when opposition to the president’s health care reform act became a rallying point of the 2012 GOP campaign, the bishops used the issue to justify joining hands with the party.

With them now on the dance floor, it’s hard to separate the Catholic bishops from other partisans. As men, they may feel invigorated and relevant. But religious leaders, they have lost the position that once helped others respect them.

SOURCE

Michael D’Antonio/Huffington Post

 
 
 
 

11 Comments

  1. marion millard says:

    As a former member, born into that religion, I’m glad I am out of it. Their stances on women’s rights, and gay rights, are heartless.

    • Jim says:

      The Catholic Church’s stances on women’s rights and gay rights help people get to Heaven. Hell is forever, dear Marion — but I guess you’d trade some momentary pleasures here on Earth (if you even get that much) for an eternity of Hell. I truly hope you don’t wind up there. Remember, God’s mercy is infinite. I hope you claim His mercy before you die.

  2. Eileen Kovatch says:

    When did politics and the Church become so intwined? Is it that government has taken over the realm of being caretakers for the poor,the oppressed, etc.? Is creating dependency on the government what Christ had in mind?

    • Carl says:

      It may not be what Christ had in mind — who after all knows what was in Christ’s mind really? But dependency on government is the very basic idea of government. Everyone depends on the government in many, many ways.

  3. Florian says:

    Now that Cardinal Dolan, Bishop Jenky and so many other bishops have targeted President Obama for defeat, they’ve gone beyond politics to racist rabble-rousing. Their utter contempt for the black man in the White House is itself contemptible. Spiritual leadership is out the window and won’t be back any time soon.

  4. blag says:

    The US IRS 501(c)3 tax-exempt status of religious and non-profit organizations requires them to not directly influence or lobby politicians in any way. The more political any church gets the more likely it is the IRS will revoke their 501(c)3 status.

    On the other hand, if we revoked tax-exempt status from all churches in the US (~$71 billion), we could send a rover to Mars every 2 weeks indefinitely (<$3 Billion).

  5. Stilbelieve says:

    So, is the writer saying that clergy don’t have the same rights as the laity as to showing a preference for one party over another?

    Question. If it is a sin against the 5th Commandment for Catholics to deny any person of his or her rights, and particularly so in the case of joining an organization that promotes such denial, then isn’t it a sin to join an organization that denies the right to life? And if being in such an organization in such numbers that gives that organization the power to keep denying his and her their rights to life, such as Catholics in the Democrat Party, isn’t their culpability that of a mortal sin?

    • blag says:

      No, because guilt by association is not a mortal sin. Self-identifying as a member of a political party does not imply that constituents believe everything that party collectively promotes. If that were true, then there would be very few people in either party.

    • Carl says:

      To Stillbelieve: why not read Blag’s helpful comment about the the meaning of “tax exempt”?

  6. Jo Shafer OPB says:

    RE “Baltimore’s Archbishop William Lori said that the bishops had reached a moment in politics ‘we have to draw the line in the sand.’ Not just the bishops but AMERICA has reached the point of drawing that proverbial line in the sand.

 
 

Leave a Comment

 




 
 

 
 
 

Switch to our mobile site