Home » Opinion » Sebelius at Georgetown — A shot across the bow of the bishops?

Sebelius at Georgetown — A shot across the bow of the bishops?


For the U.S. bishops, the battle to overturn the Department of Health and Human Services contraception mandate is a religious-freedom fight — though partisan groups have sought to characterize it as a “war against women.”

Now, Georgetown University’s decision to invite HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to a prestigious graduation awards event suggests that the controversy has moved into a new phase, with an open attempt by the mandate’s supporters within a Catholic university to endorse the new federal rule over the objections of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

Further, the ensuing controversy has revived all the issues that were hotly debated in the wake of the University of Notre Dame’s decision to honor President Barack Obama, a consistent supporter of abortion rights, as the speaker for its 2009 commencement exercise.

This week, protests immediately erupted following a May 4 announcement that Sebelius, who spearheaded the effort to secure the contraception mandate, would speak at an awards ceremony at the Georgetown Public Policy Institute.

Critics also expressed shock that Sebelius, a fervent abortion-rights supporter who headlined a 2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America fundraiser, would be given a forum at the oldest Catholic university in the United States. Some who protested the invitation have suggested that the action sought to directly challenge the U.S. bishops’ campaign to defend the free exercise of Catholic institutions by overturning the mandate through legal or legislative remedies.

Patrick Deneen, a Georgetown political science professor, has initiated a letter campaign that asks the university’s president, John DeGioia, to rescind the invitation to Sebelius.

The letter noted Sebelius’ role in securing the mandate and described the honor conferred on her by Georgetown as “a grave and serious mistake — indeed, a scandalous one.” It cited a 2004 document issued by the U.S. bishops that called on Catholic institutions to avoid providing any forums or honors for public figures who defy Catholic moral teaching.

The letter suggested that the decision to invite Sebelius could be viewed as an endorsement of her controversial policy: “In truth, it is difficult to believe that the according of this honor to Secretary Sebelius was motivated by anything other than a desire to send a message of endorsement.” [More]


National Catholic Register



  1. Rosemary Morse says:

    As a Catholic I feel that though we must hear both sides of an issue, Ms Sebelius has made her stand very clear. I feel that the University would be better advised to seek a speaker who if not fully in agreement with our Catholic Church, at least leaves herself open to other opinions. Ms Sibelius is diliberatly going against our Catholic beliefs and religious freedoms.

  2. Paul Murray says:

    Ms. Sebelius is so far outside of church teaching as one would have to be blind to miss it. To paraphrase Chesterton, We should not allow such a pestilance a place in the sun. Maybe we could have Benedict Arnold teach a class on loyalty.

  3. Joan Kuhn says:

    What about the “sensus fidelium”–the sense of the faithful? The bishops are not in touch with majority of Catholics. What is more evil: contraception, or consigning the children of parents who can’t support them to poverty, poor health, inadequate housing and education, crime, and lack of opportunity?

    • Recovering Catholic says:

      A friend of mine recently went down to Bolivia with a Catholic group of physicians, assistants and other volunteers to help the people of Bolivia with medical and housing needs. She described the poverty she saw as unbelievably deplorable. One task that the volunteer builders handled was building a house for a Catholic woman whose husband ran off and left her homeless with seven children. She could not afford to take care of her large family, had no place to live, no means of supporting herself or her kids, didn’t even have a toilet facility. My friend told me that the volunteers would have to go “in the bushes” if they went at all. Is it better to force a woman to live like this or to use some common sense and use birth control?

  4. Tony says:

    It is the function of a University to explore all thought and then discern that which is true. By not allowing people who disagree with us to speak is very short sighted and myopice. Let’s not close in on ourselves and become part of a Catholic ghetto.


Leave a Comment